For weeks now I have been working with an ad hoc group of Democrats in an effort to garner support from Democratic Senators for making Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton the next Senate Majority Leader. Today another blogger picks up on the idea.
The author of the piece writes:
I don't think women are moving en masse to McCain/Palin -- but the fizzle of enthusiasm for Obama/Biden is wanting.
Hillary Clinton is the key -- and probably always has been. It's too late to put Hillary on the ticket -- but I wonder if Obama is willing to make his first tough-minded political act his support of Hillary Clinton as Senate Majority Leader.
It would cost him as Harry Reid doesn't want to be deposed and Richard Durbin and Chuck Schumer want the job -- and she's not a formal part of Senate leadership as of now.
But extraordinary challenges require extraordinary fixes and gestures." (emphasis added)
Personally, I am not sure how costly it would be for Senator Obama to step up and voice his support for Senator Clinton as Majority Leader in 2009. Just as Senator Clinton argues that it would be good for the Party to have a Democrat in the White House come January, surely Senators Reid, Durbin, and Schumer can see that at this point the only way that can happen is if Senator Obama - and they themselves - demonstrate their respect for Clinton Democrats by getting behind this movement. And unless Senator Obama does something bold but fast his chances in the general election will continue to dwindle. So if all the talk of "unity" ever meant anything, it is time for folks like Senator Reid, Senator Durbin, Senator Schumer, and Senator Obama to show some, and they can do so quite easily by going here and signing our letter urging support of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for Senate Majority Leader. (Instructions for how any Democrat can sign the letter appear here.)
Supporting Senators who affirm their support for this powerful and important position for Senator Clinton come January makes sense for Democrats. But the Senators have to earn our support by reaching out to those of us who want to make sure that regardless of who ends up as President, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is given as powerful a position as possible within the Senate to pursue the policies and ideas that garnered her more votes than any Democratic contender for the Party's Presidential nomination ever.
Below is a segment from a post that I wrote for the Hillary Rodham Clinton for Senate Majority Leader website, explaining the significance of the position and why Senator Clinton is the person for the job.
The Senate Republican and
Democratic floor leaders are elected by the members of their party in
the Senate at the beginning of each Congress. Depending on which
party is in power, one serves as majority leader and the other as
minority leader. The leaders serve as spokespersons for their parties'
positions on issues. The majority leader schedules the daily
legislative program and fashions the unanimous consent agreements that
govern the time for debate.
….
The majority leader has
the right to be called upon first if several senators are seeking
recognition by the presiding officer, which enables him to offer
motions or amendments before any other senator. Although party
floor leadership posts carry great responsibility, they provide few
specific powers. Instead, floor leaders have largely had to depend on
their individual skill, intelligence, and personality. Majority leaders
seek to balance the needs of senators of both parties to express their
views fully on a bill with the pressures to move the bill as quickly as
possible toward enactment. These conflicting demands have required
majority leaders to develop skills in compromise, accommodation, and
diplomacy. Lyndon Johnson, who held the post in the 1950s, once said
that the greatest power of the majority leader was "the power of
persuasion."
The majority leader usually works closely with the
minority leader so that, as Senator Bob Dole explained, "we never
surprise each other on the floor." The party leaders meet frequently
with the president and with the leaders of the House of
Representatives. The majority leader also greets foreign dignitaries
visiting the Capitol.
From the U.S. Senate’s official website.
(Emphases added.)
The
power of the Senate Majority turns largely on the talents of the
Majority Leader who must be a person with great ideas and extremely
political savvy.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton fits the bill perfectly. Her ideas and policy positions have won a clear mandate from the voters of America. She has demonstrated repeatedly an ability to work across the aisle to attain major legislative accomplishments; but she has also demonstrated that she will not simply cave to expediency (e.g. her vote on the FISA bill, her ongoing fight to ensure reproductive rights for all). As for meeting with foreign dignitaries, - Senator Clinton is known and respected around the world. If her peers elect her as majority leader, this will send the message to all those abroad that she is just as respected here at home.
To become the Senate Majority Leader in 2009, Senator Clinton must win election to that position by being voted into it by her fellow Democratic Senators.
To that end, we call upon all Democratic Senators and those currently running for Senate seats to endorse our effort. We have created an Act Blue page on which we will include any Democratic Senator or senatorial candidate who confirms to us their support for and desire to vote for Senator Clinton for Senate Majority Leader. We will then spread the word of that page far and wide and we believe we will be able to tap into the resources of the 18,000 million people who put their confidence in Senator Clinton in the primary season and who now look for her continuing leadership in our country’s national and international affairs.





2012 : Will it be the mother-of-all historical moments...?
Will it really be 2 women (Clinton and Palin) who will be the main contenders???
www.carpetride.wordpress.com
Posted by: carpetride | September 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM
2012 : Will it be the mother-of-all historical moments...?
Will it really be 2 women (Clinton and Palin) who will be the main contenders???
www.carpetride.wordpress.com
Posted by: carpetride | September 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I hope she does not accept. Infact, I am hoping that she finishes her senate term then get out of DC. You and I know, she will continue to get trashed by all sides. She should not be around people who hate her and are doing everything to deminish her reputation. She and Bill can make millions on the speaking tour. Enough is enough already. She can do more for people outside than inside. Let Pelosi and her despicable friends do whatever they want to do. God bless you, Sen. Clinton.
Posted by: jess | September 10, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Just as Obama could not have a strong woman on his ticket, I feel he would not want a strong female majority leader. If (if, if, if) he were president and voicing an opinion consistent with Republicans (faith-based initiatives, perhaps social security) how would he handle a strong female leader from his party voicing an opposite opinion? He would not want her for majority leader.
Posted by: jmac | September 10, 2008 at 05:46 PM
http://carpetride.wordpress.com/
new video up!
Posted by: carpetride | September 10, 2008 at 06:11 PM
Obama would never support anyone to unseat Reid or Pelosi. There are two possibilities right now.
1. Obama wins. The current Democratic leadership becomes stronger and marginalizes Senator Clinton more.
2. Obama loses. The current Democratic leadership loses all credibility and the rank and file demands new leadership.
Under scenario 1, Senator Clinton would need to leave the Democratic Party and build her own party. She can then run for president in 2012. This would be a very difficult undertaking, but she can do it.
Under scenario 2, she would do better not to take the senate leadership, but get ready to run in 2012.
We need to wait until November to see what happens.
Posted by: Dhyana | September 11, 2008 at 12:03 AM
I have signed the letter re Hillary as Senate Majority leader, BUT I want her to run for Govenor of NY. Anyone else feel that way?
Posted by: PJ Kemp | September 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM